🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during wider concerns about industry interference with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO specifically advises a warning should cover at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for multiple violations “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We live in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its activities following with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was contacted for response.