🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would dictate when and where protests can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier administrations had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental attacks on liberty have effectively abolished the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but perverts it.

"If you can't draw the line at genocide, you likely can't draw the line at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to suppress a mass movement against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems included in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the actions of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or deliberately" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from 24 months of daily atrocities that have taken tens of thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards opposing genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually regret how casually we allowed them to slip away.